Savant has spent the last ten years as the go-to home automation company for the ultra-wealthy. Steve Jobs even leaned on this company to deck out his infamous Venus yacht. But now, Savant is aiming to bring its beautiful functional home control system to the masses by reducing prices.
Its first foray into the mass consumer market comes way of a new universal remote. There is no denying, this thing is beautiful. Watch out Logitech, you have some competition on your hands…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBx3i_ywAIg
This isn’t your typical universal remote, even by our standards. The Savant Remote comes in at 7 x 2-inches and features a large display that takes up roughly half the device. Of course, it has the expected volume, channel and playback controls. By integrating a display, it allows users to have the same familiar touchscreen interface of an iPhone or iPad as well as physical buttons.
Savant’s remote largely operates via an included hub that provides connectivity to all your home theater devices. Aside from the typical IR capabilities, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity is also built-in. At the outset, Savant claims to support more than 380,000 devices, including Apple TV, DirecTV, Roku and SONOS systems. 
Each device is grouped into “scenes” that cue up certain devices. For example, “movie” might turn on your Apple TV, adjust the sound system settings and dim your Philips Hue lights. This allows users to set preferences and create individualized scenes. Savant uses an iOS and Android app to setup the remote and corresponding devices.
One of the standout features is voice control. A large microphone button rests in the center of the remote. A press activates a Siri-like experience that allows users to speak commands. Much like the new Apple TV remote, this feature simplifies the some times frustrating experience of changing inputs and finding content. The remote itself runs on an Android operating system.
Savant is currently accepting reservations on its new $500 remote, which is set to ship “before the holiday season”. By comparison, Logitech’s recently released Elite remote retails for $350. It offers many of the same functions but is not as visually appealing as Savant. It also lacks voice functionality, which is a defining feature of this new product. Savant has certainly outdone itself in terms of design, one can’t help but think this is the remote Steve Jobs envisioned when he famously stated that he had cracked the code to building a TV.
More New Toys of the Day:
- Koto’s smart sensors track your home’s health and can even forecast storms
- This clothes-folding washing machine brings first-world laziness to defcon zero
- DJI’s new Osmo 4K camera is one expensive selfie stick
- Dyson includes air purification in its newest hot + cool bladeless fan
- Roku’s new streaming media player supports 4K and finds your remote control for you
Source: Savant
FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Introducing the AppleTV Remote Pro. Now with a large 3D Touch display compatible with all the soft, firm, and hard gestures you’ve come to expect from Apple’s 3D Touch technology. When we made this, we asked ourselves if we could do more to push ourselves. We remembered when we were kids our grandparents used to take the TV guides from the newspapers and circle their favorite shows. So we made the new display on the AppleTV Remote Pro compatible with the all new Apple Pencil. Circling and drawing on your favorite shows is an absolutely stunning experience that you have to see to believe!
call me an apple fanboy, but this is not the remote apple should’ve made.
“This is the Apple TV remote that Cupertino should’ve made” – sure Atv + remote = $ 500+ – that will sale really well….
Yeah however these are two possible reasons why they did not:
1. The remote is HUGE, just like a regular remote and doesn’t fit in the hand nicely
2. No screen so that you keep your eyes on the TV, the actual content, and don’t have to worry about fingerprints on a screen either.
Honestly while I thought that an Apple TV remote with a screen would have been nice, I agree with Apple’s decision not to have one, as it keeps your focus actually on the screen (not to mention the little cool animation when moving your finger over an icon)